Aoyama Gakuin University faculty members:
He is an uncompromising researcher.
Aiming for a prosperous society,
We are always conducting cutting-edge research.
We will explore the research results of our faculty members who are shaping the future.
TOPIC
About the Japan Association for Cultural Policy Studies' Encouragement Award
This is a system established by the Japan Association for Cultural Policy Studies to encourage and honor the research of excellent young researchers who will be the future leaders of cultural policy studies, and to further invigorate the Japan Association for Cultural Policy Studies. Eligible recipients are graduate students or those who have completed graduate school (withdrawn) for less than 10 years at the time of writing the thesis, or those who are deemed to be in an equivalent position.
Evaluation points
The book was recognized for its excellence in that it carefully collected and analyzed materials using a variety of analytical approaches, including legal and historical studies, to clarify the true intentions of the drafters and stakeholders behind the use of the word "culture" in Article 25 of the Japanese Constitution. The book has been highly praised as a work that shows the possibility of interpreting and utilizing the word "culture" in Article 25 of the Constitution from the perspective of cultural policy research.
Explore the topic with your teacher
Associate Professor Miho Nakamura
Faculty of Comprehensive Cultural Policy, Department of Comprehensive Cultural Policy
Graduated from the University of Tokyo Faculty of Law, Division II (Public Law Course). Completed doctoral program at the University of Tokyo Graduate School of Humanities and Sociology, Department of Cultural Resource Studies (Cultural Management), with a PhD (Literature). With an approach that focuses mainly on law and systems, he conducts research on the principles and practice of cultural policy, focusing on cultural policy, cultural resource studies, cultural economics, and arts management. He received this Encouragement Award for clarifying the historical and ideological background of the word "culture" in Article 25 of the Japanese Constitution, stemming from his concern about the nature of "cultural rights" in Japan.
Examining the process of cultural policy from a management perspective
Considering cultural rights from the perspective of the word "cultural" in Article 25 of the Constitution
Diverse perspectives are necessary to deepen cultural policy studies
Cultural policy studies is a relatively new academic field. Towards the end of the 20th century, or since the beginning of the 2000s, "policy research" has become widely conducted in various fields. When we say "policy studies," we mean that, compared to the traditional administrative science and political science, it takes a perspective closer to management, so to speak, which seeks to improve by examining the results and process of policies formulated and implemented by the government. It is easy to imagine research on education policy, foreign policy, and environmental policy, but cultural policy research can also be said to be an attempt to examine the series of processes involved in cultural policy from a management perspective.
Policy research is often said to be an interdisciplinary field, and when examining cultural policies, it is of course necessary to make use of the knowledge accumulated in the humanities and other cultural-related academic fields. It is not appropriate to evaluate policies solely from an economic perspective.
In my book "The Right to Live Culturally: The Potential of Article 25 of the Constitution from the Perspective of Cultural Policy Research" (Shunpusha, 2021), for which I received the Society Encouragement Award, I not only took a constitutional approach to Article 25 of the Japanese Constitution, but also took a historical and literary approach to the word "cultural" in the article, analyzing the process of its creation and what those involved at the time of its creation said, and interpreting the words found there. I feel that this interdisciplinary perspective was partly appreciated as it presents a way of research that is characteristic of cultural policy studies.

One of the basic principles of cultural policy is the "cultural right," which recognizes cultural rights as a human right. Since the Second World War, it is one of the new rights that has been discussed in the international community, along with labor rights and environmental rights. Article 27, paragraph 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted in 1948, states that "Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits."

In Japan, Article 2, paragraph 3 of the Basic Act on Culture and the Arts, which is the basic law for national cultural policy enacted in the 21st century, states that "in promoting policies related to culture and the arts, taking into consideration that creating and enjoying culture and the arts is the birthright of the people, efforts must be made to create an environment in which the people can equally appreciate, participate in, or create culture and the arts, regardless of their age, disability, economic situation, or place of residence," and calls for the creation of an environment for the realization of rights. While the content of Article 2, paragraph 3 of the Basic Act on Culture and the Arts is basically commendable, the word "consideration" in the article has always bothered me. What on earth is this being considered?
For example, in the case of education policy, the Fundamental Law of Education was enacted to realize the right to education under Article 26 of the Constitution, and individual education-related laws are positioned under the Fundamental Law of Education, which provides institutional support for education policy as a system of education law. In other words, the Fundamental Law of Education is structured to take into account the human rights under Article 26 of the Constitution. If the Fundamental Law of Culture and Arts is the equivalent of the Fundamental Law of Education in cultural policy, then which provision corresponds to Article 26 of the Constitution?
When considering this issue, one thing that cannot be avoided is Article 25, Paragraph 1, the only article in the Japanese Constitution that uses the word "culture," which states, "All people shall have the right to maintain the minimum standards of wholesome and cultured living." Article 25 of the Constitution is referred to primarily in the field of social security, but the starting point of my research was the question of whether this article could be used more effectively in cultural policy.
Previous research on Article 25 of the Constitution has mainly focused on the "right to life." Various studies and discussions have been conducted on how Article 25 of the Constitution stipulates the "right to life limited to economic aspects," as typified by public assistance. On the other hand, the word "cultural" has not received much attention, and there has been almost no consideration of Article 25 in connection with "cultural rights."
However, since the Constitution stipulates that people should enjoy a "cultural minimum standard of living," I felt that it was necessary to have a proper discussion in cultural policy research about the possibility of treating the "culture" in Article 25 as a cultural right and utilizing this in cultural policy.
Additionally, the discussion of "unnecessary and non-urgent" activities during the COVID-19 pandemic in recent years was also an issue that had a major impact on culture. Artistic activities were deemed "not life-threatening" and were subject to many restrictions, such as not being able to hold events as planned. It is true that there are many situations that are not "immediately" life-threatening, and there are also situations where "non-urgent" activities can be enjoyed slowly. However, can we really say that they are "unnecessary"? Art and culture have a profound impact on our lives and, by extension, our existence. If we could clearly present the idea of cultural rights, which regards culture as an issue related to human rights, surely that would provide a basis for saying that culture is not "unnecessary." This was also what motivated me to turn my research into publication.
I think a cultural society is one where people have "wonderful coincidences" through contact with various cultures. Even if the content and value of each coincidence is different, I hope that we live in a society where everyone has the same overall chance of encountering wonderful coincidences. This could be called a society where cultural rights are established.

The research on "culture" in Article 25 of the Constitution is a study of the concept of "cultural rights," which is the core of cultural policy. By publishing a book based on my doctoral thesis, I was able to further refine the theory of cultural policy, and I am also very pleased that it was recognized in the form of the Society Encouragement Award.
Furthermore, in the sense that we have been able to provide a new perspective that was not present in previous research on Article 25 of the Constitution, such as constitutional law and social security studies, we believe that we have been able to demonstrate to people outside the field the significance of the existence of cultural policy research and cultural policy studies, which are relatively new academic fields.
It took me about 10 years to write my doctoral thesis, including two maternity and childcare leaves and getting a job. It took several more years to revise, re-edit, and revise it before publishing it as a solo work. Because it took so long to publish it as a book, there were times when I worried that the content and writing style might be outdated. However, after the COVID-19 pandemic, I was able to make significant changes to the structure and add new parts, and as a result, I was able to publish it in the form of a book that could reach many people, and I was very pleased that it was well received.
If you keep going without giving up, you can produce results, and I'm grateful to have a forum where they can recognize your work. I hope that this award will encourage and support researchers of a younger generation than me who aspire to study cultural policy to continue their research.

In the process of building a sustainable society, the SDGs have been gaining attention in recent years, and interest in human rights in general is on the rise. There are a wide range of themes to consider in cultural policy, such as the cultural lives of the poor, the elderly, the disabled, and children, as well as the guarantee of labor rights and environmental improvements for people working in the cultural industry. Although this is still a policy field in the early stages of development, it can also be considered a research area for the "blue ocean strategy" (an untapped market with few competitors). There seems to be no need to worry about running out of research ideas.
Cultural policy research is an interdisciplinary field that requires diverse perspectives. While knowledge of social sciences such as law and public administration is important, it is also important to know various cultures. For those who are aiming to work in this field, I recommend visiting art museums, checking out movies that you find interesting, and paying attention to local cultural assets. Aoyama Gakuin University is often said to have a beautiful campus, and the Aoyama campus also has two buildings that are registered tangible cultural properties under the Cultural Properties Protection Act (Berry Hall (Corporate Headquarters) and Mashima Memorial Hall), so I think it would be good if you were to take a look at them.
I believe that simply spending each day in this way, keeping your antennae open for "wonderful chance encounters," will also contribute to research into cultural policy.

There are no related items yet.